000 | 01396nam a22002177a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
008 | 230905b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 ukr d | ||
020 | _a9783856764005 | ||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
245 | _aFounding Myths | ||
260 |
_aZurich: _bgta Verlag _c2019 |
||
300 | _a144 p. | ||
490 |
_agta papers _v3 _x2504-2068 |
||
500 | _aFounding in the double sense of the word naturally plays an important role in architecture. But also the history and theory of architecture seem to particularly require the idea of a foundation, a beginning. On the occasion of its 50th anniversary, the Institute for the History and Theory of Architecture (gta) addressed the problem of beginnings – in its own history as well as in architecture in general – and in particular the role of founding myths. As the recurring recourse in architecture to the primitive hut or the three Vitruvian principles of firmness, utility and beauty (firmitas, utilitas, venustas) shows, myths occupy an important place in professional discourse. The contributions to the third issue of the gta papers question the tradition of these myths and examine their potential for the interpretation of the past and for the design of future projects. | ||
650 | _aARCT-H | ||
700 | _aLaurent Stalder | ||
700 | _aTom Avermaete | ||
700 | _aMaarten Delbeke | ||
700 | _aPhilip Ursprung | ||
700 | _aIta Heinze-Greenberg | ||
942 | _cBOOK | ||
999 |
_c1553 _d1553 |